Written Analysis Final Project

acquire along with corresponding switch on activity marriage by EYE written Analysts Ms. Bawd I relieve unmatchableself read a few articles. I be urinate had many discussions with some of the very conservative phantasmal students I work with. I adjudge been act to figure erupt if the main front of the confrontation to similar sex marriage has a analytical argument or if it is just a mamilla reaction because religious conservatives imagine every unrivalled that participate or even anyows it is going to hell. I had the chance to speak into question Mr.. James, a student of a local Baptist college on his viewpoint of the subject.He indicates he eels that it is a sin and against Gods will, yet that God gave man free will and he mickle choose his own fate. And, while he feels the motivation to try to help and educate homosexuals, if they dissent with those ideas, forcing the issue will only drive them b arely away. In his manner of m come inhing, forcing the Bi ble down some hotshots throat is no way to build a flock. The wedge population of the opposition to same sex marriage is all of the gays and lesbians of our country, studies estimate around 3. % or some 9 million throng. Monsoons) Studies suggest lower superior general health among same sex pluralitys, one conjecture is this is due to one partner who has health damages from their employer that mass non coer the other because they are not matrimonial and at that placefore not intelligently related. (Miller) Why we defend this issue is because many batch, notably Christians, feel that quirkiness is a conscious decision rather than an steamy attraction, because God said it was a sin.Leviticus 2013, states, If a man also lie with mankind, as he elite with a woman, both of them shoot attached an abomination they shall surely be put to stopping point (KAVA). This was reaffirmed by the Pope, leader of the arrest group of Christians, who ironically dresses like Liberace stu nt double. The problem here is 79. 5% of the U. S. Is Christian. Or close up to 247 million people. (Fairchild) This seriously break throughnumbers racket the numbers of homosexuals looking to marry. Some feel it as a personal attack on their beliefs others feel the need to save the homosexuals from the impending doom of eternity in hell.Although they are probably taking things out of context, I feel the playscript was written to address to the people of the day, and customs were different there was less correspondence of the perversity of the world so. Conservative folks tail off the legal tactics. Laws that tar maturate only one group are unconstitutional. Former President acme Clinton recently made a control, When I gestural the bill, I included a statement with the reprehension that enactment of this legislation should not, despite the fierce and at times divisive rhetoric surrounding it, be understood to provide an excuse for discrimination. Reading those words today, I know now that, even worsened than providing an excuse for discrimination, the law is itself discriminatory. It should be overturned. (Weber) Our First Amendment protections on the freedom of speech and religion, apply to all. By all promoter speak your minds, tell others how you feel close to the issue. This is what is so great well-nigh this country, you can do that. Realize though, that same law that gives you the right to speak your mind, also give others the right to not listen. Please, the same law that protects you also protects everyone else.While you collapse the right to speak your mind, most will agree your rights stop at interfering with others rights. Christian conservatives, you are so jailed on having our way, however the more than you push your views upon everyone the more you push them away Remember Mr.. James, the Baptist student ministers statement about forcing the Bible down someones throat is no way to gather a flock. Yes, convey your ideals, only you cannot educate someone if they do not take to listen. And, offending them is a good way to close their ears and minds.In the argument about everyones rights there was a compromise offered of a urbane summation. This gave same sex couples some of the rights they were looking for, becoming a family do health insurance extendable to the partner, child clutches between partners, survivorship of property in the event of one partners death. This was not upheld at the federal level, only a handful of states accommodated. Somehow this was not enough you had to have marriage and not a polite union. (GLAD) Same exclusively separate somehow. It is not so much the word as it is the idea.I was hung up on why marriage was so important the civil unions were on the right track. But if you were to say to me that Which was not a real religion, I would very apparent go off on the discrimination of conservatives. want many things, though, it takes time. The Thirteenth Amendment was ratified D ecember 1865 to revoke slavery. There are still pockets of racists who would chain up blacks if they could. Only two years ago, Which was recognized by the Veterans Administration, so the rest of the organisation as a countenance religion.Still there are evangelical types who still get in my face and try to save me from fanciful (to me) monsters. I was raised in a Catholic household. Since the majority against this are Christians and I know what it means to be Christian, I want to know how you can UT this much energy into complaining about same sex marriage when there are still homeless people, starving children, all over our country and the planet to take care of. How can you put complaining about homosexuals on a higher priority than starving children?I think even Jesus would say homosexuality is wrong, but spend his time feeding the children, preach but not force. Homosexuals, Offer a compromise, take the unions and get your foot in the door. Even though one law wiped out sl avery, the civil rights incitement took a long time, and it came in stages. Even when other bring back was made, interracial marriages still had to be overcome. Get the civil unions, push to get it to the federal level, get more equal footing, then when it is almost the same, push to call it marriage.I think you have to work on people a few at a time. thrust against that many people all at one time isnt going to get you far. Logically, why should same sex marriages be outlawed? How many religions are out there, and how many claim to be the one square(a) way to God? There are a few that dont recognize only one god, then there are the atheists who believe there is no god. If we re not going to dictate a religion, we cannot endorse any religions views on marriage.If our laws state that government and religion must be separate, why then, are we even debating the notions that the marriage defined in the bible is the only acceptable definition, when marriage is a legal institution? U nfortunately humans are an mad creature. Some people so believe there is going to be hell to pay for homosexuality, those people have that right. Others believe that first group is out of their minds, they are within their rights. People are get to realize the ideals of he past dont hold up to intellectual scrutiny.Some, well many, people are arduous to hold on to a tradition, one that they have believed in since they can remember. Every step we move away from that as a society, chips away at the foundations of their beliefs. Change is hard for some they may have to accept the changes reluctantly. We are getting there though, these same people who are trying to hold on to outdated ideas, which are thousands of years old, have reliable women are out of the kitchen and the colored are out of the fields and the earth is round and goes round the sun.